At the same time, the growing popularity of composite benchmarks , which combine a range of indicators sourced from other benchmarks, increases the distortions inherent in this peculiar form of data aggregation because of the myriad difficulties inherent in concept definition, the selection and weighting of different indicators, and how indicators with different measurement units are made commensurable and translated into numbers.
Bad science: International organizations and the indirect power of global benchmarking
These troubling dynamics are found at every level of political economy that is subject to benchmarking today, from the local to the global, although they do not apply equally across different types of institutions and actors. The practice of global benchmarking raises ethical concerns about whether it is appropriate to comparatively assess the national performance of dissimilar countries with very different structural circumstances, historical legacies, and governing arrangements with a common metric.
Rather, the interrogation of who and what is measured, how, and who benefits from benchmarks is fundamental to understanding the International Political Economy of everyday life in the contemporary era.
Andreas, P. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Cooley, A.
- Shopping Cart!
- Handbook of Integral Equations (Handbooks of Mathematical Equations);
- Trials of Labour: The Re-Emergence of Midwifery.
- You are here:?
- Holdings information at Imperial College London Library.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kelley, J. Merry, S. Broome, A.
Library Hub Discover
European Journal of International Relations. Review of International Studies , 41 5 , pp. LeBaron, G. Seabrooke, L. Review of International Studies, 41 5 , pp. Global Benchmarking Database. Scorecard Diplomacy. The quantification of everyday life. He was found by the Bureau of Statistics to be One against whom there was no official complaint, And all the reports on his conduct agree That, in the modern sense of an old-fashioned word, he was a saint, For in everything he did he served the Greater Community. Except for the War till the day he retired He worked in a factory and never got fired, But satisfied his employers, Fudge Motors Inc.
The Press are convinced that he bought a paper every day And that his reactions to advertisements were normal in every way. Policies taken out in his name prove that he was fully insured, And his Health-card shows he was once in hospital but left it cured. Our researchers into Public Opinion are content That he held the proper opinions for the time of year; When there was peace, he was for peace: when there was war, he went. He was married and added five children to the population, Which our Eugenist says was the right number for a parent of his generation. And our teachers report that he never interfered with their education.
kpathway.com/wp-includes/moffat/mevuf-april-dating-coach.php Was he free? The question is absurd: Had anything been wrong, we should certainly have heard. Ranking freedom. The emerging politics of international rankings and ratings: a framework for analysis Alexander Cooley; 2. Just who put you in charge? Corruption rankings: constructing and contesting the global anti-corruption agenda Mlada Bukovansky; 4. Measuring stateness, ranking political orders: indexes of state fragility and state failure Nehal Bhuta; 5.
Competing measures of democracy in the former Soviet Republics Seva Gunitsky; 6. Rating the ratings craze: from consumer choice to public policy outcomes Jack Snyder and Alexander Cooley.
Shop by category
Nation-state and globalization. International relations Statistics Political aspects. International economic relations Statistics Political aspects. World politics 21st century. Cooley, Alexander [editor] Snyder, Jack L. Related item.
Print version:: ; ISBN: Summary Over the last decade, international rankings have emerged as a critical tool used by international actors engaged in global governance. State practices and performance are now judged by a number of high-profile indices, including assessments of their levels of corruption, quality of democracy, creditworthiness, media freedom, and business environment. However, these rankings always carry value judgments, methodological choices, and implicit political agendas. This volume expertly addresses the important analytical, normative, and policy issues associated with the contemporary practice of 'grading states'.
The chapters explore how rankings affect our perceptions of state performance, how states react to being ranked, why some rankings exert more global influence than others, and how states have come to strategize and respond to these public judgments. The book also critically examines how treating state rankings like popular consumer choice indices may actually lead policymakers to internalize questionable normative assumptions and lead to poorer, not improved, public policy outcomes. Holdings information at the University of East Anglia Library Live circulation data is not available.
Back to results Back to item. University of Birmingham Libraries.
University of Bristol Libraries.